Dr. Gjoko Muratovski is the Chief Innovation Officer at the Icona Design Group.

getty

When roughly 125 stakeholders—myself included—joined the Industry 5.0 Community of Practice plenary that was held earlier this year in Brussels, the European Commission framed the moment as a genuine crossroads. The question put to the room by Commission leadership: Is Industry 5.0 mission accomplished, time to renew, or time for something else?

That question matters well beyond Brussels. Industry 5.0, the EU's framework built on human-centricity, sustainability and resilience, is becoming the operating logic behind EU industrial policy, procurement, ESG expectations and funding. For executives outside the EU, that's not abstract policy chatter; it's the shape of the market you'll be competing in, selling into or building supply chains around.

The Tension Is Real, And Worth Taking Seriously

As leaders, we shouldn't paper over the hard questions: Does values-driven industry make Europe less competitive, not more? One camp of thinking is that Industry 5.0's cost profile could deepen the pressure Europe's manufacturers already face from lower-cost producers abroad, particularly in sectors like solar. Others push back, framing pure cost competition as a "low road" toward decline, and the alternative—sustained investment, human-centric design, proactive industrial policy—as the only durable path.

At the plenary, one industry panelist captured the executive dilemma well, making the case that sustainability efforts only matter if they don't come at the expense of results, and, just as importantly, that results built without sustainability in mind won't last.

I'd add a point the panel didn't dwell on but that anyone who has watched European industrial history closely should recognize. We've already run the experiment of growth stripped of human-centricity, resilience and sustainability. The neoliberal restructuring that swept post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s didn't just deliver short-term efficiency gains at a long-term social cost, it gutted entire industrial regions, dismantled the social contracts holding communities together.

From my perspective, this happened because there was a belief that the fastest way to catch up with a more advanced, more competitive West was to remove safeguards that slowed growth—protections, continuity, human considerations—in pursuit of parity.

The temptation to treat human-centricity, resilience and sustainability as costs to be trimmed for short-term competitiveness is the same temptation that hollowed out entire regions a generation ago. If the bloc chases parity with faster, cheaper rivals by abandoning the principles Industry 5.0 is built on, it risks inflicting a version of that damage on itself by trading long-term resilience for a short-term bump that history suggests won't hold.

What This Means If You're Not An EU Company

International businesses often treat EU industrial frameworks as someone else's problem until they need EU market access, supply chain partners or customers reporting against EU standards.

Three signals are worth planning around now:

• A common taxonomy is coming. One breakout session on monitoring found wide inconsistency in what companies mean by "Industry 5.0," and a 117-question self-assessment tool found sustainability the weakest of the three pillars. A majority (60%) favored a clearer common definition. Whatever taxonomy emerges will shape ESG and procurement expectations for any company selling into EU value chains, European or not.

• ESG reporting is heading toward consolidation, not expansion. Rather than piling new frameworks on top of existing ones, participants pushed to streamline ESG reporting into one coherent system with common standards and incentives, including provisions for SMEs. Companies juggling overlapping ESG regimes may see the burden simplify, but see the resulting standard become a harder gate to entry.

• Human-centricity is becoming a business KPI, not a values statement. There have been repeated calls for building Industry 5.0 principles directly into performance indicators, alongside revenue and margin. Expect workforce participation, retraining investment and human-machine collaboration design to become procurement criteria, not just talking points.

Recommendations For Executives, Wherever You're Based

• Treat the self-assessment tools as an early-warning system, not a compliance chore. Piloting an Industry 5.0-style assessment now, even informally, gives you a head start on wherever EU benchmarks land.

• Build the business case internally before regulation forces it. ROI on human-centricity and sustainability is still poorly quantified. Companies that develop credible internal metrics now will help shape the standard later, rather than scramble to meet an external one.

• If you're courting EU manufacturing partners or customers, audit your own workforce and resilience practices. Expect due diligence on worker participation, reskilling investment and supply chain resilience to become routine, alongside pricing and lead time.

• Watch the funding and policy instruments, not just the rhetoric. The proposed European Competitiveness Fund and Industrial Accelerator Act are still moving through the EU policy process—worth tracking, not assuming, as they'll determine how much of this framework comes with real financial incentive versus obligation.

The Bottom Line

Europe isn't claiming Industry 5.0 as a moral posture. It's claiming it as a competitiveness strategy, built on the premise that growth without people, resilience or environmental accounting eventually fails, sometimes generationally. That's a bet worth understanding before it becomes the price of admission to the EU market.

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?